Twitter has recently rolled-out a new feature - the ability to create sub-groupings of people that you follow, and share them with other users. This has a number of useful benefits, including the ability to be able to group people into certain subject areas (for example, you might have a list of people that you work with, and another one for friends outside work).
Let's start with the good privacy feature that has been build into the current version of lists - the ability to mark lists private or public. This is a sensible idea and has been implemented in a way that is easy to use (although we would prefer it if the default was for lists to be private rather than public - but this does seem a little like splitting hairs!)
Unfortuntely - the way that the lists have been set up currently are open to a number of forms of abuse. The primary reason for this is because a user does not have to authorize being added to a list. i expect that this is a useful (and necessary) feature for the top-ranked users, who could be added to hundreds or thousands of lists and would not want to have to accept every single request to add them.
On the other hand - this does mean that people can add you to lists without your permissions - and some of the following could occur:
1. You are added to a list that gives away some information which you didn't want shared (e.g. parents of XYZ Middle School) - this could be significant information leakage, dependent on which lists you are added to.
2. You are added to a list that isn't relevant to you (not so bad)
3. You are added to a list maliciously or acciedentally that is damaging to your reputation (e.g. Registered Sex Offenders)
There needs to be a trade-off here. On one hand, we could subject everyone to "list spam" and render the feature next to useless. On the other hand, there could / should be some better tools to manage what lists you are on, and to remove yourself.
Although lists "follow" you in the same way as people do - you can't seem to block the list, just the person who created the list.
It's a brave new world out there. Would be interested to hear others experiences and thoughts on this.
Let's start with the good privacy feature that has been build into the current version of lists - the ability to mark lists private or public. This is a sensible idea and has been implemented in a way that is easy to use (although we would prefer it if the default was for lists to be private rather than public - but this does seem a little like splitting hairs!)
Unfortuntely - the way that the lists have been set up currently are open to a number of forms of abuse. The primary reason for this is because a user does not have to authorize being added to a list. i expect that this is a useful (and necessary) feature for the top-ranked users, who could be added to hundreds or thousands of lists and would not want to have to accept every single request to add them.
On the other hand - this does mean that people can add you to lists without your permissions - and some of the following could occur:
1. You are added to a list that gives away some information which you didn't want shared (e.g. parents of XYZ Middle School) - this could be significant information leakage, dependent on which lists you are added to.
2. You are added to a list that isn't relevant to you (not so bad)
3. You are added to a list maliciously or acciedentally that is damaging to your reputation (e.g. Registered Sex Offenders)
There needs to be a trade-off here. On one hand, we could subject everyone to "list spam" and render the feature next to useless. On the other hand, there could / should be some better tools to manage what lists you are on, and to remove yourself.
Although lists "follow" you in the same way as people do - you can't seem to block the list, just the person who created the list.
It's a brave new world out there. Would be interested to hear others experiences and thoughts on this.
RSS Feed